考虑老年人出行行为的公交票价补贴政策研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 13-19.

考虑老年人出行行为的公交票价补贴政策研究

姚恩建^{*a, b}，闫峥^a，郇宁^{a, b}

北京交通大学a. 交通运输学院；b. 综合交通运输大数据应用技术交通运输行业重点实验室，北京 100044

收稿日期:2019-06-26 修回日期:2019-08-23 出版日期:2019-12-25 发布日期:2019-12-25
作者简介:姚恩建(1971-)，男，贵州遵义人，教授，博士.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划/ National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB1201601)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金/Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China(2019JBZ107).

Evaluation on Subsidy Policy of Public Transport Ticket Considering Elderly Travel Behavior

YAO En-jian^{a, b}, YAN Zheng^a, HUAN Ning^{a, b}

a. School of Traffic and Transportation; b. Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2019-06-26 Revised:2019-08-23 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2019-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

北京市现行的老年人公交免费政策在保障老年人日常出行的同时，诱发了老年人无谓出行、高峰出行、冒乘出行等问题. 针对不同出行目的、出行距离及出发时刻下老年人出行行为偏好，基于北京市第五次综合交通调查数据，构建多场景下老年人出行方式选择MNL (Multinominal Logit)模型，分析错峰优惠、阶梯式津贴等补贴政策对多方式分担率的影响，并从公共交通运能利用率、政府补贴和老年人公交支出等方面评价政策效果. 结果表明：相对现行政策，两种政策均可有效调节老年人出行行为，前者能够缓解政府财政补贴压力，但造成老年人公交支出的上升；后者侧重保护老年人群的社会福利，对行为的引导效果更显著，但仍需大量的财政补贴投入.

关键词: 交通工程, 城市交通, 票价补贴, 方式选择, MNL模型, 老龄化

Abstract:

The current free public transportation policy for the elderly in Beijing guarantees their daily trips, which has induced problems of unnecessary travel, peak travel, and impersonated travel. Given the differences of travel purposes and distance and the characteristics of travel behaviors of the elderly, we construct a multinomial Logit (MNL) model of travel mode and tests the precision of the MNL model based on the data of the fifth comprehensive traffic survey in Beijing. We analyze the impact of two subsidies on the sharing rate of different modes of travel by using MNL model, and evaluate the effects from the utilization rate of public transport capacity, government subsidies and public transport expenditure of the elderly. The result shows that, compared with the current policies, both policies can effectively regulate the travel behavior of the elderly. Meanwhile, the peak subsidy policy can alleviate the pressure of government financial subsidy and increase the public transport expenditure of the elderly, and stepped subsidy policy can improve the social welfare of the elderly, but it may result in a substantial increase in government financial subsidy expenditure.

Key words: traffic engineering, urban traffic, fare subsidy, mode choice, multinominal Logit model, aging

中图分类号:

U268.6

姚恩建，闫峥，郇宁. 考虑老年人出行行为的公交票价补贴政策研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 13-19.

YAO En-jian, YAN Zheng, HUAN Ning. Evaluation on Subsidy Policy of Public Transport Ticket Considering Elderly Travel Behavior[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(6): 13-19.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19934.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V19/I6/13

参考文献

[1] 张钦亚, 姚弘之, 徐远申. 我国现行“敬老卡”政策的实施问题与改进策略: 以上海“敬老卡”免费乘车的使用为例[J]. 上海城市管理, 2015, 24(5): 71- 75. [ZHANG Q Y, YAO H Z, XU Y S. Implementation problems and improvement strategies of elderly welfare card in place in China[J]. Shanghai Urban Management, 2015, 24(5): 71-75.]

[2] TOM R, WILLIAM M. Concessionary bus fares for older people in Scotland-are they achieving their objectives? [J]. Journal of Transportation Geography, 2009, 17(6): 451-456.

[3] ROGER M. Has the policy of concessionary bus travel for older people in Britain been successful?[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2014, 2(2): 81-88.

[4] BUEHLER R, NOBIS C. Travel behavior in aging societies comparison of germany and the united states [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010(2182): 62- 70.

[5] 黄素心. 论老年公交优惠政策及其改革[A]. Mark Zhou. Advances in artificial intelligence (Volume 3): proceedings of 2011 international conference on management science and engineering (MSE 2011) [C]. Engineering Technology Press, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, National University of Singapore: Information Engineering Research Institute, 2011: 136-140. [HUANG S X. On the reform of preferential public traffic policies for senior citizen[A]. Mark Zhou. Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Volume 3): Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (MSE 2011)[C]. Engineering Technology Press, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, National University of Singapore: Information Engineering Research Institute, 2011: 136-140.]

[6] 孔萍. 公交分时定价下居民出发时间选择意向研究 [D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013. [KONG P. Study on the intention of residents' departure time choice under the conditions of the time-of-day pricing on bus[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013.]

[7] 田伦. 乘车优惠对老年人出行行为影响研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017. [TIAN L. A study on the influence the policy on concessionary bus have on the travel behaviour of the elderly[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2017.]

[8] 冯建喜, 杨振山. 南京市城市老年人出行行为的影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(12): 1598-1608. [FENG J X, YANG Z S. Factors influencing travel behavior of urban elderly people in Nanjing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(12): 1598-1608.]

[9] 高晶鑫, 隽志才, 李津, 等. 通勤出发时间和驻停次数联合选择模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21(3): 366- 370. [GAO J X, JUN Z C, LI J, et al. Commuters' joint choice model of departure time and number of no-work stops[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2012, 21 (3): 366-370.]

[10] 刘蔚. 城市居民低碳出行的影响因素及引导策略研研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2014. [LIU W. Study on influencing factors and guiding strategies of urban residents' low-carbon travel[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2014.]

[1]	刘晓冰, 李奉孝, 田欣妹, 闫学东. 基于通勤模式的都市圈中心结构判别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 17-28.
[2]	许奇, 陈越, 黄靖茹, 高顺祥, 张志健. 考虑出行费用的就业可达性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 37-44.
[3]	林建新, 刘博, 赵霞, 张蕾. 基于混合约束自编码器的机动车工况智能构建方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 109-116.
[4]	刘春禹, 刘永红, 罗霞, 朱颖. 混合交通流环境下单交叉口自动驾驶车辆轨迹优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 154-162.
[5]	张小雨, 邵春福, 王博彬, 黄士琛. 新冠疫情影响下居民共享出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 186-196.
[6]	李欣, 戴章, 李怀悦, 胡笳. 基于连续近似模型的轨道交通与常规公交耦合优化设计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 206-213.
[7]	郝妍熙, 刘戎阳, 胡华, 方勇, 刘志钢. 单向通道行人-自行车混合流建模及自组织现象研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 223-229.
[8]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师. 山区双车道公路货车碰撞预测的双变量冲突极值模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 230-238.
[9]	赵传林, 贺少松, 孙淑敏, 王钰涵. 基于理性疏忽理论的交通疏散网络双层优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 239-246.
[10]	陈小红, 蓝秋雨. 不确定交通需求下交叉口信号配时区间优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 247-256.
[11]	李冰, 王正辉, 马铭炜, 杨鸿宇, 冯悦. 信号交叉口行人二次过街下右转车通行能力与延误估计模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 257-267.
[12]	朱彤, 秦丹, 董傲然, 杜雨萌, 魏雯. 公交驾驶员违规类型同交通事故间的关联分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 322-329.
[13]	张建波, 孙建平, 徐春玲, 郭镜霞, 温慧敏, 宋国华. 考虑交通运行条件影响的驾驶员特征聚类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 330-336.
[14]	马景峰, 任刚, 李豪杰, 曹奇, 杜建玮. 电动自行车与机动车事故严重性影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 337-348.
[15]	毛保华, 王敏, 何天健, 陈海波. 城市公共交通服务水平研究回顾和展望[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 2-13.