Multi-drivers Risk Evaluation Based Proactive Intervention of
Drivers' Risky Behavior Under Connected Transportation Contexts

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.04.032

Abstract

Abstract: A proactive intervention framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of risky driving behavior among multiple drivers under intelligent and connected transportation contexts is proposed in this study. By selecting driving behavior parameters, different types of drivers' risky behavior are defined and identified based on their driving data. Then, an area method is utilized to obtain an integrated score considering the frequency, duration, and amplitude of each risky driving behavior, and the relationship between this score and crash risk is established by using variable weights. Based on the mechanism of data envelopment analysis (DEA), a modelling approach for risky driving behavior evaluation is proposed. Next, a microsimulation scenario based on Simulation of Urban Mobility(SUMO) is built to simulate the intelligent and connected transportation environment, and the historical driving data of multiple drivers are extracted by a time window. The comprehensive evaluation method of risky driving behavior is applied to identify risky drivers. Two intervention methods based on a cumulative window approach and a sliding window approach are proposed, respectively, and each method implements two strategies, i.e., single-vehicle intervention and multi-vehicle intervention. Finally, based on the micro-simulation experiment, the effect of different intervention methods is analyzed, and the impacts of window size, driver acceptance rate, and the number of intervention vehiclesare discussed. The results showed that the strategy of multi-vehicle intervention has achieved better results. The total scores of drivers' risky behavior under the cumulative window approach and the sliding window method are decreased by 22.80% and 10.50% , respectively. Compared with the situation without intervention, when the intervention acceptance rate is 50% , the total score of drivers' risky behavior in the scenario still decreases. Relative to the cumulative window approach, the sliding window approach appears to be a more reasonable way for practical application. The proposed framework can provide technical support for driving behavior monitoring.

Key words: traffic engineering, risky driving behavior, data envelopment analysis, proactive intervention, intelligent and connected transportation

摘要： 依托智能网联技术背景，本文提出基于多驾驶人综合风险评价的不良行为主动干预框架。选取驾驶场景中多驾驶人行为表征参数，基于行车数据定义并辨识驾驶人的各类不良行为；利用面积法实现对不良驾驶行为发生频次、持续时间以及幅值的综合计算，并以可变权重构建其与事故风险的关联关系；借鉴数据包络分析思想，提出考虑可变权重的不良驾驶行为综合评价方法；利用Simulation of Urban Mobility(SUMO)搭建智能网联环境下驾驶仿真平台，以时间窗方式抽取场景中多驾驶人的历史行车数据，利用不良驾驶行为综合评价方法辨识风险驾驶人，提出基于累加窗口与滑动窗口的主动干预方法，每种方法均实现干预单车与干预多车两种策略；分析不同干预手段的效果，探究窗体大小、驾驶人接受率、干预车辆数等对干预结果的影响。研究表明，干预多车策略取得较好的效果，基于累加窗口与滑动窗口的驾驶人不良行为总得分分别下降 22.80%和10.50%；与无干预情况相比，当干预接受率为50%时，驾驶人不良行为总得分仍有所降低；与基于累加窗口方法相比，基于滑动窗口的干预方法更适合实际应用。本文提出的框架可为驾驶行为监测等提供技术支持。

关键词: 交通工程, 不良驾驶行为, 数据包络分析, 主动干预, 智能网联

CLC Number:

U491.254

BAO Qiong, QU Qi-kai, TANG Han-run, CHEN Jian-ming, SHEN Yong-jun. Multi-drivers Risk Evaluation Based Proactive Intervention of Drivers' Risky Behavior Under Connected Transportation Contexts[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 283-292.

鲍琼, 屈琦凯, 唐涵润, 陈建明, 沈永俊. 网联环境下基于多驾驶人风险评价的不良行为主动干预研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 283-292.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.04.032

http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V22/I4/283

References

[1] World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018: Summary[R]. World Health Organization, 2018.

[2] PAEFGEN J, STAAKE T, FLEISCH E. Multivariate exposure modeling of accident risk: Insights from pay-asyou-drive insurance data[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 61(3): 27-40.

[3] HARPREET S, ANKIT K. Analyzing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2021, 150: 105908.

[4] JUN J, OGLE J, GUENSLER R. Relationships between crash involvement and temporal-spatial driving behavior activity patterns: Use of data for vehicles with global positioning systems[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2019(1): 246-255.

[5] LI F, ZHANG H, CHE H, et al. Dangerous driving behavior detection using smartphone sensors[C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016: 1902-1907.

[6] ELLISON A B, BLIEMER M C J, GREAVES S P. Evaluating changes in driver behaviour: A risk profiling approach[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 75: 298-309.

[7] CASTIGNANI G, DERRMANN T, FRANK R, et al. Driver behavior profiling using smartphones: A low-cost platform for driver monitoring[J]. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2015, 7(1): 91-102.

[8] DUDEK C L, HUCHINGSON R D. Manual on real-time motorist information displays[R]. McLean: Federal Highway Administration, 1986.

[9] 李志斌, 刘攀, 单肖年, 等. 高速公路可变限速控制策略安全性效果仿真[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 48 (5): 942- 948. [LI Z B, LIU P, DAN X N, et al. Safety effect simulation of variable speed limit control strategy for expressway[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(5): 942-948.]

[10] 牛世峰, 袁伟, 李海琴, 等. 语音信息对驾驶人超速行为干预效果研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(5): 79-84. [NIU S F, YUAN W, LI H Q, et al. Study on the intervention effect of voice information on drivers' speeding behavior[J]. Transportation System Engineering and Information, 2016, 16(5): 79-84.]

[11] 刘金星, 李可民, 付阳. 一种车载疲劳驾驶预警系统设计方案[J]. 电声技术, 2018, 42(9): 61-64. [LIU J X, LI K M, FU Y. Design scheme of vehicle fatigue driving warning system[J]. Electroacoustic Technology, 2018, 42 (9): 61-64.]

[12] FARAH H, KOUTSOPOULOS H N. Do cooperative systems make drivers' car-following behavior safer?[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 41: 61-72.

[13] LI L, LU G, WANG Y, et al. A rear- end collision avoidance system of connected vehicles[C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014: 63-68.

[14] PAYRE W, DIELS C. I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2019, 82: 102932.

[15] HONG Z, CHEN Y, WU Y. A driver behavior assessment and recommendation system for connected vehicles to produce safer driving environments through a "follow the leader" approach[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 139: 105460.

[16] HUSSAIN Q, ALHAJYASEEN W K M, PIRDAVANI A, et al. Do detection-based warning strategies improve vehicle yielding behavior at uncontrolled midblock crosswalks?[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 157: 106166.

[17] Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales. Speed problem definition and countermeasure summary, speed [R]. New Southwales, 2000.

[18] ELLISON A B, GREAVES S P, BLIEMER M C J. Driver behaviour profiles for road safety analysis[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 76: 118-132.

[19] BASTOS J T, SHEN Y, HERMANS E, et al. Traffic fatality indicators in brazil: State diagnosis based on data envelopment analysis research[J]. Accident Analysis andPrevention, 2015, 81: 61-73.

[20] SHEN Y, HERMANS E, BRIJS T, et al. Road safety risk evaluation and target setting using data envelopment analysis and its extensions[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2012, 48: 430-441.

[21] BAO Q, TANG H, SHEN Y. Driving behavior based relative risk evaluation using a nonparametric optimization method[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18: 1-15.

Multi-drivers Risk Evaluation Based Proactive Intervention of Drivers' Risky Behavior Under Connected Transportation Contexts

网联环境下基于多驾驶人风险评价的不良行为主动干预研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	QIN Wen-wen , LI Huan , LI Wu , GU Jin-jing , JI Xiao-feng. A Review of Truck Driving Behavior and Safety [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 55-74.
[2]	XU Jin , YANG Zi-miao , CHEN Qin , CHEN Zheng-wei. Speed Distribution and Vehicle Type Classification of Mountain Expressway Based on Electronic Toll Collection Data [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 75-84.
[3]	MA Qing-lu , NIU Sheng-ping , ZENG Hao-wei , DUAN Xue-feng. Mechanism of Non-recurring Congestion Evolution Under Mixed Traffic Flow with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 97-106.
[4]	HU Li-wei , LV Yi-fan, ZHAO Xue-ting, XUE Yu, ZHANG Cheng-jie, LEI Guo-qing , LIU Fan. Influence Factors and Coupling Relationship of Traffic Accident Injury Degree Based on a Data-driven Approach [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 117-124.
[5]	NIE Qing-hui , LONG Xiu-jiang , LIANG Cheng , XIA Jing-xin , OU Ji-shun. Optimal Allocation and Routing of Sanitation Vehicles on Urban Roads Under Multiple Constraints [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 273-284.
[6]	LIN Pei-qun , ZENG Wei-jia, ZHOU Chu-hao, PANG Chong-hao. Impact of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures on Expressway Transportation in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 318-327.
[7]	JIAO Peng-peng , LI Ru-jian, WANG Jian-yu, GE Hao-jing, CHEN Yue. Causes Analysis on Severity of Elderly Pedestrian Crashes Considering Latent Classes [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 328-336.
[8]	REN Qi-liang , XU Tao , CHENG Long-chun. An Optimization Model of Road Traffic Flow Path Identification Based on RFID Data [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 89-95.
[9]	CHEN Yong-heng , LI Hao-nan, WU Chang-jian, LI Wan-ning. Simulation Modeling of Additional Channelization Island Type Exit Based on Cellular Automata [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 96-105.
[10]	QIN Wen-wen , YAN Qi-yang , GU Jin-jing , LI Wu , JI Xiao-feng. Driving Style Recognition and Quantification for Heavy-duty Truck Drivers [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 137-148.
[11]	TIAN Shun, ZHENG Bo-wen , SUN Jian , LIU Jing-yu. Calculation of Carbon Footprint of Electric Bus Operation Based on Real World Driving Cycles [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 149-157.
[12]	FENG Hai-xia , WANG Xing-yu , XIAN Hua-cai , LIU Xin-hua , LI Jian , NING Er-wei. Impact of Urban Traffic Operations on Vehicle Carbon Dioxide Emission [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 167-175.
[13]	CHEN Zheng, WEN Hui-ying. Survival Analysis of Vehicle Lane-changing Duration on Road Segment Adjacent to Freeway Tunnels [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 210-217.
[14]	SUN Qi-peng, QIAO Jia-lu , ZHANG Kai-qi , SUN Jia. Platform Competition Strategy Based on Social Network Structure Characteristics of Online Ride-hailing Market [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 1-6.
[15]	LI Yan, ZENG Ming-zhe, ZHU Cai-hua, WANG Fan , DENG Ya-juan. Identification of Freeway Ramp Influence Areas Based on Multi-point Loop Data [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 53-62.