中国综合交通运输绿色效率的空间特征研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.030

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 300-308.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.030

• “碳达峰、碳中和”下的交通运输业发展 • 上一篇下一篇

中国综合交通运输绿色效率的空间特征研究

马奇飞^1a,1b，贾鹏^*1a,1b,2，匡海波^1a,1b

1. 大连海事大学，a. 航运经济与管理学院，b. 综合交通运输协同创新中心，辽宁大连 116026； 2. 中国科学院大学，经济与管理学院，北京 100190

收稿日期:2022-08-25 修回日期:2022-10-06 接受日期:2022-10-18 出版日期:2022-12-25 发布日期:2022-12-24
作者简介:马奇飞(1992- )，男，河南开封人，博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/(72174035)；辽宁省“兴辽英才”项目(XLYC2008030)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(3132022641)

Spatial Characteristics of Comprehensive Transportation Green Efficiency in China

MA Qi-fei^1a,1b, JIA Peng^*1a,1b,2, KUANG Hai-bo^1a,1b

1a. School of Maritime Economices and Management, 1b. Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, Liaoning, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2022-08-25 Revised:2022-10-06 Accepted:2022-10-18 Online:2022-12-25 Published:2022-12-24
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China；Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program； Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将社会发展指数纳入综合交通运输效率评价指标体系，采用SBM(Slacks-Based Measure) 模型和Dagum基尼系数等分析方法，以中国30个省区为研究对象，测度综合交通运输绿色效率，并研究其空间特征。结果表明：中国综合交通运输绿色效率整体水平较低，区域差异较大，具有显著的空间非均衡性；综合交通运输绿色效率空间非均衡性具有明显的阶段性特征，研究前期区域差异逐渐扩大，后期呈缩小态势；中国综合交通运输绿色效率总体差异较大，区域内差异东部最小，中部次之，西部最大，东-中区域间差异与东-西区域间差异相差不大，但演化趋势此消彼长，中-西区域间差异始终居于最低位，区域内差异是造成总体区域差异的根源。最后，根据研究结论提出相关政策建议。

关键词: 综合运输, 综合交通运输绿色效率, SBM模型, 空间特征, Dagum基尼系数

Abstract: This paper introduces the social development index (SDI) into the evaluation framework of comprehensive transportation green efficiency (CTGE), and uses the SBM model, Dagum Gini Coefficient and the data from 30 regions in China to estimate and explore the CTGE and its spatial characteristics. The results indicate that: the social development index can significantly improve the CTGE, but the overall level of CTGE in China was relatively low, with great regional differences and obvious spatial imbalance. The spatial disequilibrium of CTGE had obvious stage characteristics, and the regional differences gradually expanded in the initial stage of the study, but gradually shrunk in the later stage of the study. The overall CTGE in China was different among regions. Intra-regional differences was the largest in the west and the smallest in the east, and was the main source of total disparity. At last, some relevant policy suggestions are proposed based on the research conclusions.

Key words: integrated transportation, comprehensive transportation green efficiency, Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model, spatial characteristics, Dagum Gini coefficient

中图分类号:

马奇飞, 贾鹏, 匡海波. 中国综合交通运输绿色效率的空间特征研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 300-308.

MA Qi-fei, JIA Peng, KUANG Hai-bo. Spatial Characteristics of Comprehensive Transportation Green Efficiency in China[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(6): 300-308.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.030

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I6/300

参考文献

[1] 曹文翰, 张雪永. 历史、理论与实践: 解读交通强国战略的三重逻辑[J]. 社会科学研究, 2021(3): 34- 40. [CAO W H, ZHANG X Y. History, theory and practice: The triple logic of interpreting the strategy of building China's strength in transportation[J]. Social Science Research, 2021(3): 34-40.]

[2] 宋京妮, 吴群琪, 孙启鹏, 等. 基于 SBM-undesirable 模型的综合运输效率评价[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(5): 32-38. [SONG J N, WU Q Q, SUN Q P, et al. SBM-undesirable model-based efficiency evaluation for integrated transportation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(5): 32-38.]

[3] 李连成. 交通强国的内涵及评价指标体系[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 19(2): 12-19. [LI L C. Connotation and evaluation index system for building China's strength in transportation[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 19 (2): 12-19.]

[4] 景崇毅, 宋海军, 孙宏. 我国机场容量扩张与运营效率变化的动态研究: 基于DEA-Tobit/Logit框架的两阶段分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(5): 235- 241, 249. [JING C Y, SONG H J, SUN H. Airport capacity expansion and efficiency change in China based on two stage analysis of DEA-Tobit/Logit method[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(5): 235-241, 249.]

[5] 贾鹏, 胡燕, 袁爽, 等. 中国省域综合交通运输效率及空间关联性研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(9): 219-229. [JIA P, HU Y, YUAN S, et al. A research on the comprehensive transportation efficiency and its spatial relevancy in China's provinces[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(9): 219-229.]

[6] 朱顺应, 廖凌云, 吴景安, 等. 城市客运交通工具碳排放效率差异：以襄阳市为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 158-166. [ZHU S Y, LIAO L Y, WU J A, et al. Difference in carbon emission efficiency of urban passenger transportation modes: A case of Xiangyang city[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 158-166.]

[7] 姜晓红, 陈莎, 张毅. 物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 313- 321. [JIANG X H, CHEN S, ZHANG Y. Calculation method of total carbon emission and efficiency of logistics enterprises[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 313-321.]

[8] 张建斌, 陈巧丽. 区域综合交通运输效率差异时空演化及影响因素分析[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 37(6): 34-42. [ZHANG J B, CHEN Q L. Analysis of spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factor in regional integrated transport efficiency differences[J]. Journal of Guizhou University (Social Sciences), 2019, 37 (6): 34-42.]

[9] MA Q F, JIA P, KUANG H B. Green efficiency changes of comprehensive transportation in China: Technological change or technical efficiency change?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 304: 127115.

[10] MA Q F, JIA P, SUN C Z, et al. Dynamic evolution trend of comprehensive transportation green efficiency in China: From a spatio-temporal interaction perspective[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(3): 477-498.

[11] CHARNES A, COOPER W, ROODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.

[12] TONE K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach [R]. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2004, 2004: 44-45.

[13] DAGUM C. A new decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratio[J]. Empirical Economics, 1997, 22(4): 515-531.

[14] 李杰伟, 张国庆. 中国交通运输基础设施资本存量及资本回报率估算[J]. 当代财经, 2016(6): 3-14. [LI J W, ZHANG G Q. Estimation of capital stock and capital return rate of China's transportation infrastructure[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2016(6): 3-14.]

[15] LIU J G, LI S J, JI Q. Regional differences and driving factors analysis of carbon emission intensity from transport sector in China[J]. Energy, 2021, 224: 120178.

中国综合交通运输绿色效率的空间特征研究

Spatial Characteristics of Comprehensive Transportation Green Efficiency in China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	申皓, 张锦, 孙文杰, 洪治潮, 李国旗. 基于货物时间价值的空铁联运转运枢纽选址优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 48-57.
[2]	刘松, 舒文, 彭勇, 邵毅明, 乐美龙. 双重不确定下应急物资多式联运可靠路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 58-66.
[3]	郭姝娟, 魏梓峰, 孙正宇, 李一义, 李纲. 疫情不同阶段西部陆海新通道市场分担率变化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 305-313.
[4]	曾玮, 贾晋中. 新形势下中欧班列的市场空间及其改善策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 60-67.
[5]	关雎文, 周琪, 毛保华. 碳排放控制的国际比较及经验借鉴[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 281-290.
[6]	王佳彬, 孙启鹏, 吴群琪, 杨涵晞, 马飞, 郑颖颖, 任玮. 基于位移剩余的最优货物运输服务分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 47-54.
[7]	季金华, 刘亚君, 别一鸣, 王琳虹. 基于无人机与卡车协作的封控社区生活物资配送方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 264-272.
[8]	片峰, 陈阳, 庞世花, 苏敏. 考虑铁路折扣的集装箱公路与多式联运博弈定价[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 1-10.
[9]	邓桂花, 钟鸣, RAZA Asif, HUNT John-douglas, 周勇. 基于整体规划框架的区域综合货运规划建模方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 30-42.
[10]	张峻屹, 李双金, 马爽. 基于市民生活行为学的交通行为研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 1-16.
[11]	李杰梅, 高丽, 祁婧洁, 尹琪. 腹地-口岸可达性格局演化及其空间溢出效应分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 29-36.
[12]	冯芬玲, 孙楠佳. 考虑时间价值的中非多式联运路径与出海港选择[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 45-53.
[13]	刘忠波, 王淇娴, 郑红星. 海空协同的远海岛礁战储物资供给优化模型与算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 268-279.
[14]	姜晓红, 陈莎, 张毅. 物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 313-321.
[15]	张英贵, 肖杨, 雷定猷, 陆强. 长大货物多式联运网络风险传播动力学仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 14-23.