基于Petri 网模型的铁路快捷货运产品可靠性评价

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 147-153.

基于Petri 网模型的铁路快捷货运产品可靠性评价

王丹竹，郎茂祥^*，孙岩

北京交通大学交通运输学院，北京100044

收稿日期:2015-03-20 修回日期:2015-05-09 出版日期:2015-08-25 发布日期:2015-08-25
作者简介:王丹竹（1985-），女，河北秦皇岛人，博士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71390332-3）

Railway Express Freight Product Reliability Evaluation Based on Petri Net Model

WANG Dan-zhu, LANG Mao-xiang, SUN Yan

School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing100044, China

Received:2015-03-20 Revised:2015-05-09 Online:2015-08-25 Published:2015-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为准确评价及预测铁路快捷货运产品的可靠性，在全面分析铁路快捷货运产品可靠性影响因素的基础上，建立用于产品可靠性评价的故障树模型，并采用下行法求取故障树的最小割集；结合Petri 网建模方法与故障树基本理论，将产品故障树转化为 Petri 网仿真模型，并证明两者的等价性；利用Matlab 仿真软件进行基于关联矩阵的Petri 网模型求解，并以北京—上海间特快货物班列为例，得到该产品的可靠度及故障因素重要度排序.实证结果显示，应用Petri 网模型来求解产品可靠性评价问题，不仅能够有效提升求解过程的效率，而且准确易行.研究成果可以为提高铁路快捷货运产品可靠性和市场竞争力提供科学依据和必要支撑.

关键词: 铁路运输, 快捷货运产品, 可靠性, 故障树, Petri网

Abstract:

To accurately evaluate the reliability of railway express freight product, on the basis of analysis on reliability influence factors of it, a fault tree is built, and the minimal cut sets of the fault tree is given. Combined with the basic theory of Petri net and fault tree analysis, the fault tree of railway express freight product is transformed into Petri net simulation model, and this transformation is proved to be an equivalent transformation. Using Matlab simulation software, the reliability and the importance of failure factors of railway express freight product between Beijing and Shanghai are obtained. Empirical results indicate the Petri net can solve the problem efficiently and effectively, which demonstrates feasibility of the method in addressing this problem. Research results of this paper will provide a scientific basis and necessary support in improving the reliability and market competitiveness of railway express freight product.

Key words: railway transportation, express freight product, reliability, fault tree, Petri net

中图分类号:

U29-39

王丹竹，郎茂祥，孙岩. 基于Petri 网模型的铁路快捷货运产品可靠性评价[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(4): 147-153.

WANG Dan-zhu, LANG Mao-xiang, SUN Yan. Railway Express Freight Product Reliability Evaluation Based on Petri Net Model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(4): 147-153.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19042.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2015/V15/I4/147

参考文献

[1] 宋保维. 系统可靠性设计与分析[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2000. [SONG B W, System reliability design and analysis[M]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University Press Co. Ltd., 2000.]

[2] Lindsay N M, Parvathy A K. Simulation and application on power system reliability for bulk electrical system[M]. Springer India: Power Electronics and Renewable Energy Systems, 2015.

[3] Coolen F P A, Coolen-Maturi T. Predictive inference for system reliability after common-cause component failures[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 135: 27-33.

[4] Chang P C, Lin Y K. Fuzzy-based system reliability of a labour-intensive manufacturing network with repair[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014 (ahead-of-print): 1-16.

[5] Chen C, Liu J, Taylor G A, et al. Power system reliability evaluation considering substation interior under protection failure impact[C]. Power System Technology (POWERCON), 2014 International Conference on, IEEE, 2014: 330-335.

[6] 李翔, 李大伟, 张蓉, 等. 基于Markov 的模块化电传操纵系统软件可靠性模型[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2013, 43(1): 86- 90. [LI X, LI D W, ZHANG R, et al. Modularized software reliability model of FBW (Fly-By- Wire) system based on Markov[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2013, 43(1): 86-90.]

[7] Contini S, Matuzas V. Analysis of large fault trees based on functional decomposition[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96(3): 383-390.

[8] Majdara A, Wakabayashi T. Component-based modeling of systems for automated fault tree generation[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(6): 1076-1086.

[9] 张友生, 李雄. 基于Petri 网的软件体系结构可靠性分析[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2006, 42(25): 69- 73. [ZHANG Y S, LI X. Reliability analysis of software architecture based on Petri net[J]. Editorial Board of Computer Engineering and Applications, 2006, 42(25): 69-73.]

[10] 刘玲艳, 吴晓平, 田树新. 基于粗糙集和Petri 网的随机流网络可靠性评价方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2010, 25 (8): 1273. [LIU L Y, WU X P, TIAN S X. Assessment method of system reliability for stochastic flow network based on rough sets theory and Petri nets[J]. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(8): 1273.]

[1]	耿庆桥, 贾元华, 陈军团. 基于变权可拓物元的铁路“走出去”公私合营项目风险决策[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 64-71.
[2]	戚建国, 周厚盛, 杨立兴, 周亚茹, 张春田. 灵活编组条件下轨道交通客货协同运输方案优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 197-205.
[3]	张晓明, 徐芳, 江文辉, 蒋朝哲. 考虑资金约束的中欧班列运价与运量决策分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 30-36.
[4]	张春田, 戚建国, 杨立兴, 高原, 高自友. 基于不确定旅客需求的高速铁路鲁棒列车开行方案研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 115-123.
[5]	周勇, 张杰, 钟祾充, 李文锋, 王国栋. 铁路集装箱中心站多轨道吊柔性协同调度优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 133-141.
[6]	牛惠民. 轨道列车时刻表问题研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 114-124.
[7]	刘葛辉，陈绍宽，刘爽，金华，王丹阳. 资源约束下城市轨道交通基础设施维修任务安排优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 163-169.
[8]	徐智勇. 铁路电分相布设及纵断面协同优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 170-175.
[9]	钟明轩，乐逸祥，周磊山. 高铁站列车和调车作业计划一体化编制方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 176-186.
[10]	吕敏，帅斌，周照玉，张士行，左静，李林卿. 考虑边境站延误风险的中欧班列运输路径决策[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 254-259.
[11]	张蒙蒙，许茂增. 考虑政府补贴决策的中欧班列竞合关系研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 16-21.
[12]	李岸隽，王典，彭其渊. 基于个体出行链的区域城际铁路规划方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 30-36.
[13]	刘晓伟，晏启鹏，倪少权，吕苗苗，吕红霞. 考虑空车调配协调的货物列车开行方案优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 180-188.
[14]	李晓娟，石佳娜，李得伟，闫振英. 考虑定制化列车的运行图与能力协同优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 95-100.
[15]	倪少权，杨皓男，彭强. 基于乘客路径选择的多制式轨道交通客流分配[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 108-115.