我国农村客运服务满意度影响因素分析 ——以北京市昌平区和贵州省黔南州为例

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 224-229.

我国农村客运服务满意度影响因素分析 ——以北京市昌平区和贵州省黔南州为例

葛晓鹏¹，王庆云^*1，张艺²

1. 北京交通大学经济管理学院，北京 100044；2. 交通运输部规划研究院，北京 100028

收稿日期:2017-12-20 修回日期:2018-03-13 出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2018-04-25
作者简介:葛晓鹏(1983-)，男，天津人，博士生.

Significant Factors on Service Satisfaction of Rural Passenger Transport in China

GE Xiao-peng¹, WANG Qing-yun¹, ZHANG Yi²

1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China

Received:2017-12-20 Revised:2018-03-13 Online:2018-04-25 Published:2018-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了对比研究不同影响因素对农村客运服务满意度的影响程度，通过对北京市昌平区和贵州省黔南州农村客运服务的调查，本文选取受教育水平、乘车频率、出行目的、候车时间、步行距离、票价等6个影响因素做重点分析，并建立多元有序Logistic模型.研究结果表明，同一影响因素对不同经济社会发展水平地区的影响效果不同.在农村客运服务满意度方面：服务可达性比服务经济性的影响更大，供给侧影响因素比需求侧影响因素的影响更大，乘客异质性只具有间接影响作用.所以，本文建议根据不同区域的实际情况，从科学规划线网布局、加大政府投入力度、创新市场运营方式等方面，有针对性地制定相关政策，不断提高农村客运服务的供给效率和满意度.

关键词: 运输经济, 满意度, 多元有序Logistic模型, 农村客运服务, 供给侧结构性改革

Abstract:

To compare the influence degree of different influence factors on the satisfaction degree of rural passenger transport service, a case-comparative study between Changping District, Beijing and Qiannan State, Guizhou Province is conducted. Various characteristics and events, including educational level, ride frequency, trip purpose, waiting time, walking distance and ticket price, are evaluated as influencing factors for service satisfaction of rural passenger transport in China. To identify the significant factors, a multilevel mixed-effect ordered Logistic model for matched data is established. The results show that: the factor plays a different role in region with stage of various social economic development level; The influence of service accessibility on rural passenger service satisfaction is greater than that of service economy; The influence factors of supply side are more influential on rural passenger service satisfaction than those on demand side; Passenger heterogeneity affected rural passenger service satisfaction indirectly. Further, to improve the efficiency on supple side of rural passenger transport service, this paper discusses the targeted policy from the perspectives of network planning, government investment and operation.

Key words: transportation economy, satisfaction level, ordinal Logistic model, rural passenger transport service, supply-side structural reform

中图分类号:

F542

葛晓鹏，王庆云，张艺. 我国农村客运服务满意度影响因素分析 ——以北京市昌平区和贵州省黔南州为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(2): 224-229.

GE Xiao-peng, WANG Qing-yun, ZHANG Yi. Significant Factors on Service Satisfaction of Rural Passenger Transport in China[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(2): 224-229.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19614.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V18/I2/224

参考文献

[1] 付巧峰. 公路客运服务质量综合评价[J]. 长安大学学报 ( 自然科学版), 2008, 26(4): 87- 90. [FU Q F. Comprehensive evaluation on service quality of highway passenger transportation[J]. Journal of Chang’an University(Natural Science Edition), 2008, 26(4): 87- 90.]

[2] 程龙生, 牛俊磊, 时建中. 公路长途客运顾客满意度模型及其应用[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2012, 31(1): 15-25. [CHENG L S, NIU J L, SHI J Z. Customer satisfaction index model for long-distance highway passenger transportation and its application[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2012, 31(1): 15-25.]

[3] KAMRUZZAMAN M, HINE J. Participation index: A measure to identify rural transport disadvantage[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(4): 882-899.

[4] EBOLI L, MAZZULLA G. Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit[J]. Journal of Public Transportation, 2007, 10(3): 21-34.

[5] ZAKIAH P, SYAHRIAH B, MANSOR I, et al. Assessing passengers’ satisfaction level on bus service in selected urban and rural centers of peninsular malaysia[J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, 222 (7): 837-844.

[6] HARIFAH M N, NA’ASAH M, JURRY F. Determinants of customer satisfaction of service quality: City bus service in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 153(56): 595-605.

[7] GEORGE C L B, CARLOS F G. The effects of service quality dimensions and passenger characteristics on passenger’s overall satisfaction with an airport[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2015, 44- 45(3): 77-81.

[8] JI J, GAO X. Analysis of people’s satisfaction with public transportation in Beijing[J]. Habitat International, 2010, 34(4): 464-470.

[9] EBOLI L, MAZZULLA G. An ordinal logistic regression model for analyzing airport passenger satisfaction[J]. Euromed Journal of Business, 2009, 4(1): 40-57.

[1]	王健, 王慧, 胡晓伟, 李园园. 高峰期考虑乘客议价的网约车定价与平台收益及社会福利优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 54-63.
[2]	王景鹏, 祝蕊, 王鹏飞. 需求不确定下的网约车司机最优工资水平研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 178-185.
[3]	徐素秀, 谢冰, 秦威, 程会兵. 电动汽车充电与换电模式定价及投资策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 183-189.
[4]	鲁皓, 卢鑫, 焦柳丹. 收费公路资产证券化定价及发行方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 40-46.
[5]	王永, 谭克虎, 张娟. 基础设施公私合营模式融资影响因素及空间溢出效应研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 47-53.
[6]	吴贞瑶，帅斌，左博睿. 通货膨胀下高速公路公私合营项目的收入调节研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 156-161.
[7]	杨亚璪，李全森. 基于面板数据的乘用车购买偏好分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 227-232.
[8]	钟异莹，邵毅明，陈坚. 考虑出行环境的居住满意度结构方程模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 130-136.
[9]	彭勇，高鹤. 带时间窗的多行程交换箱甩挂路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 166-174.
[10]	梁喜，陈月. 基于客流量和车公里的城市公共交通混合财政补贴优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 41-47.
[11]	霍月英，李晓娟，闫振英，李文权. 基于乘客满意度的公交车站立乘客面积研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 157-162.
[12]	高永峰，四兵锋. 基于需求弹性的城市公交票价优化方法及实证分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 163-168.
[13]	朱顺应，王淑钰，邹禾，王红. 公交信息的乘客光环效应[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 169-175.
[14]	李杰梅，吴浩，刘陈，郝京京 . 边境城市跨境可达性对口岸经济的影响机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(2): 30-36.
[15]	孙湘湘，周小亮. 交通基础设施投资、要素市场扭曲和经济增长[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(1): 13-18.