面向混合交通流的智能网联车鸣笛意图识别模型

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 55-62.

• 智能交通系统与信息技术 • 上一篇下一篇

面向混合交通流的智能网联车鸣笛意图识别模型

梁军^*1，徐鹏¹，蔡英凤¹，陈龙¹，华国栋²

1. 江苏大学汽车工程研究院，江苏镇江 212013；2. 江苏智行未来汽车研究院，南京 210000

收稿日期:2018-11-06 修回日期:2019-05-06 出版日期:2019-08-25 发布日期:2019-08-26
作者简介:梁军(1976-)，男，江苏扬州人，教授.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划/National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB1600500)；国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1664258)；江苏省研究生实践创新计划项目/ Jiangsu Postgraduate Practical Innovation Project(sjcx18_0746).

Identification Model for Horn's Intention of Intelligent Connected Vehicle under the Mixed Traffic Stream

LIANG Jun¹, XU Peng¹, CAI Ying-feng¹, CHEN Long¹, HUA Guo-dong²

1. Automotive Engineering Research Institute, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China; 2. Jiangsu Zhixing Future Automobile Research Institute, Nanjing 210000, China

Received:2018-11-06 Revised:2019-05-06 Online:2019-08-25 Published:2019-08-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为使混合交通流(Mixed Traffic Stream，MTS)下智能网联车(Intelligent Connected Vehicle，ICV)实现鸣笛意图(Horn’s Intention，HI)识别，更好地遵循常规车辆(Manual Vehicle， MV)的驾驶意图，提出ICV 对MV 鸣笛声的“ 感知(Perception) — 定位(Location) — 识别 (Recognition)”模型(简称HI-PLR)，采用深度卷积—循环神经网络(Deep Convolution Recurrent Neural Network, DCRNN)算法感知鸣笛车辆(Horning Vehicles, HV)的鸣笛声；采用到达时差 (Time Difference of Arrival, TDOA)算法定位HV；再基于运动时间窗(Motion Time Window, MTW)的支持向量机(Support Vector Machine, SVM)算法识别HI.实验结果表明，HI-PLR可使 ICV 对混流中车辆的鸣笛声感知准确率达90.4%，定位角度估计误差小于5°，HI 识别率达 82.5%，为ICV在MTS中的智能驾驶决策提供依据.

关键词: 智能交通, 鸣笛意图识别, HI-PLR模型, 智能网联车, 混合交通流

Abstract:

With the aim that intelligent connected vehicles is able to identify horn's intention to follow the driving intention of the conventional vehicles better under the mixed traffic stream, perception-location-recognition model is proposed of ICV to the horn of conventional vehicles. Deep convolution recurrent neural network is used to percept the horn of the horning vehicles. time difference of arrival is exploited for the location of the HV. Support vector machine based on motion time window is applied to recognize the HI of the HV. The experimental results indicate that such a model enables the average accuracy rate of perception that the ICV conducts on the horn of the HV in the mixed traffic stream to amount to 90.4%, the error of positioning angle is within 5 degrees and the average recognition rate of HI is 82.5%, which provides the basis for the intelligent driving decision of the ICV in the mixed traffic stream.

Key words: intelligent transportation, recognition of horn’s intention, HI- PLR model, intelligent connected vehicle, mixed traffic stream

中图分类号:

U268.6

梁军，徐鹏，蔡英凤，陈龙，华国栋. 面向混合交通流的智能网联车鸣笛意图识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 55-62.

LIANG Jun, XU Peng, CAI Ying-feng, CHEN Long, HUA Guo-dong. Identification Model for Horn's Intention of Intelligent Connected Vehicle under the Mixed Traffic Stream[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(4): 55-62.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19870.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V19/I4/55

参考文献

[1] MAHMASSANI H S. 50th anniversary invited article— autonomous vehicles and connected vehicle systems: Flow and operations considerations[J]. Transportation Science, 2016, 50(4): 1140-1162.

[2] CHEN D, AHN S, CHITTURI M, et al. Towards vehicle automation: Roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part B Methodological, 2017, 100(1): 196-221.

[3] OLIA A, RAZAVI S, ABDULHAI B, et al. Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 22(3): 244-262.

[4] LEMAITRE G, SUSINI P, WINSBERG S, et al. The sound quality of car horns: Designing new representative sounds[J]. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2009, 95 (2): 356-372

[5] QIN Y, HAO W, WEI W, et al. Analysis on stability and safety for mixed traffic flow with connected auxiliary driving[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2018, 48(1): 188-194.

[6] TALEBPOUR A, MAHMASSANI H S. Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2016, 71(7): 143-163.

[7] ZHANG H, HUANG S, JIANG W. Car horn localization algorithm and its implementation based on microphone arrays[J]. Noise & Vibration Control, 2018, 38(3): 10-14.

[8] JINGJING M, YIHU W. Driving intentions identification based on continuous pseudo 2D hidden markov model [C]// International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology & Automation, IEEE, 2012: 629-632.

[9] TAKANO W, MATSUSHITA A, IWAO K, et al. Recognition of human driving behaviors based on stochastic symbolization of time series signal[C]// International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, 2008: 167-172.

[10] REED F A, FEINTUCH P L, BERSHAD N J. Time delay estimation using the LMS adaptive filter-static behavior[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1981, 29(3): 561-571.

[11] WINSBERG S, MCADAMS S. The sound quality of car horns designing new representative sounds[J]. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2009, 95(2): 356-372.

[12] WANG J, YANG Y, MAO J H, et al. CNN- RNN: A unified framework for multi- label image classification [C]// Proc of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016: 2285-2294.

[13] KNAPP C, CARTER G. The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003, 24(4): 320-327.

[14] LIU J, ZHANG Y, YING L. Recognition and localization of car whistles using the microphone array[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2012, 39(1): 163-167.

[15] 熊晓夏, 陈龙, 梁军, 等. 危险换道驾驶行为预测方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2017, 39(9): 1040-1046. [XIONG X X, CHEN L, LIANG J, et al. A study on the driving behavior prediction of dangerous lane change[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1040-1046. ]

面向混合交通流的智能网联车鸣笛意图识别模型

Identification Model for Horn's Intention of Intelligent Connected Vehicle under the Mixed Traffic Stream

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郭烈, 胥林立, 秦增科, 王旭. 自动驾驶接管影响因素分析与研究进展[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 72-90.
[2]	徐猛, 刘涛, 钟绍鹏, 姜宇. 城市智慧公交研究综述与展望[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 91-108.
[3]	程君, 张立炎, 陈启宏. 一种基于地图辅助的自动驾驶视-惯融合定位方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 117-126.
[4]	王国栋, 刘立, 孟宇, 马智萍, 郑淏清, 顾青, 白国星. 一体式车辆避撞轨迹规划与跟踪控制[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 127-136.
[5]	马东方, 陈曦, 吴晓东, 金盛. 基于强化学习的干线信号混合协同优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 145-153.
[6]	许波桅, 王玲玲, 李军军. 自动化码头多级作业超网络延误传导特性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 280-289.
[7]	田会娟, 刘嘉伟, 翟佳豪, 邓琳琳. 基于多入侵线的视频车速检测方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 49-56.
[8]	贾彦峰, 曲大义, 赵梓旭, 王韬, 宋慧. 基于安全势场的网联自主车辆跟驰行为决策及模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 85-97.
[9]	刘文, 汪文博. 基于秩最小化矩阵去噪的船舶轨迹重构方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 106-114.
[10]	赵建东, 陈溱, 焦彦利, 张凯丽, 韩明敏. 重点营运车辆的异常驾驶行为识别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 282-291.
[11]	徐东伟, 彭航, 商学天, 魏臣臣, 杨艳芳. 基于图自编码-生成对抗网络的路网数据修复[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 33-41.
[12]	游峰, 梁健中, 曹水金, 肖智豪, 吴镇江, 王海玮. 面向多目标跟踪的密集行人群轨迹提取和运动语义感知[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 42-54.
[13]	王福建, 俞佳浩, 赵锦焕, 梅振宇. 基于站点实时关联度的短时公交客流预测方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 131-144.
[14]	张毅, 姚丹亚, 李力, 裴华鑫, 晏松, 葛经纬. 智能车路协同系统关键技术与应用[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 40-51.
[15]	龙建成, 郭嘉琪. 动态交通分配问题研究回顾与展望[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 125-138.