相邻信号影响下的无信号路段驾驶员礼让行人分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.03.019

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 215-223.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.03.019

相邻信号影响下的无信号路段驾驶员礼让行人分析

陈永恒^*，刘卓剑

吉林大学，交通学院，长春130022

收稿日期:2024-12-25 修回日期:2025-03-20 接受日期:2025-04-02 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-06-21
作者简介:陈永恒(1978—)，男，吉林公主岭人，副教授，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(52131202)。

Analysis of Drivers Yielding to Pedestrians on Unsignalized Midblock Crosswalks Under Influence of Adjacent Traffic Signals

CHEN Yongheng^*, LIU Zhuojian

College of Traffic and Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China

Received:2024-12-25 Revised:2025-03-20 Accepted:2025-04-02 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-06-21
Supported by:
Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52131202)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 无信号路段行人过街是行人与车辆冲突最为直接的交通行为。行人作为交通弱势群体其通行权益必须得到保障，有关部门已经颁布政策法规约束驾驶员在人行横道处的行为并对违法行为进行拍摄和处罚，但是在缺乏监管的路段，驾驶员对法规的遵守情况仍不理想。因此，为研究驾驶员礼让行人行为，本文从吉林省长春市3处无信号路段行人过街设施采集了可能对驾驶员礼让行人产生影响的车辆、行人和交通环境因素，构建基于二元Logistics回归的驾驶员礼让行人概率预测模型，并进行敏感性分析。研究发现并证实，在大多数调查路段，车辆在上游信号停止线的排队会对礼让行人行为有负面影响，车辆在下游信号为红灯时对驾驶员礼让行为具有促进作用(p＜0.05)；汇总回归结果证实车头时距、过街人数、行人运动学提示、过街位置、电子警察、车道数量、上游信号排队情况、下游信号灯色(p＜0.01)与行人方向(p＜0.05)对无信号路段驾驶员礼让行人有显著相关性。卡方检验发现，营运车辆驾驶员对位于有、无电子警察路段的行人礼让行为，以及安装电子警察路段驾驶员对于路中、路侧行人的礼让行为具有差异性。结合上述结论，本文还给出提升无信号控制路段行人过街安全性的建议。

Abstract: Pedestrian crossings at unsignalized midblock crosswalks are traffic facilities where conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles directly occur. As pedestrians are vulnerable in urban traffic, and their right of way must be protected. Consequently, regulatory authorities have implemented policies and laws to enforce driver compliance at such crosswalks, with violations subject to penalties. However, on certain unmonitored roads, driver adherence to yielding regulations remains unsatisfactory. To investigate driver yielding behavior, this study collected vehicle, pedestrian, and traffic environmental data that may influence drivers' yielding behavior from three unsignalized midblock crosswalks in Changchun, Jilin Province. The factors were analyzed for the influence on driver yielding decisions. Binary Logistic regression models were developed to predict yielding probabilities, followed by sensitivity analyses. The findings indicate that vehicles queuing at upstream stop lines have a negative impact on yielding behavior in most segments, whereas a red light at downstream signals significantly promotes drivers' yielding behavior (p <0.05) . The regression analysis demonstrate that multiple factors significantly correlate with yielding behavior, including time headway, number of crossing pedestrians, pedestrian kinematic cues, pedestrian position, presence of electronic police monitoring, number of lanes, upstream queuing conditions, downstream signal light color (p<0.01) , and pedestrian direction (p<0.05) . Additionally, chi-square tests revealed behavioral differences: commercial vehicle drivers at crosswalks exhibited varying yielding rates depending on e-police presence, and drivers at monitored crosswalks responded differently to pedestrians crossing from the middle versus the curb. Based on these findings, the study also proposes suggestions for enhancing pedestrian safety at unsignalized midblock crosswalks.

Key words: traffic engineering, signal correlation, Logit model, vehicle yielding, unsignalized midblock crosswalk

中图分类号:

U491

陈永恒, 刘卓剑. 相邻信号影响下的无信号路段驾驶员礼让行人分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 215-223.

CHEN Yongheng, LIU Zhuojian. Analysis of Drivers Yielding to Pedestrians on Unsignalized Midblock Crosswalks Under Influence of Adjacent Traffic Signals[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2025, 25(3): 215-223.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.03.019

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V25/I3/215

参考文献

[1] NOONAN T Z, GERSHON P, DOMEYER J, et al. Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing[J]. Accident, Analysis and Prevention, 2023, 192: 107236.

[2]彭勇,蒋沛,沙晓宇,等.行人过街人车冲突等级评价及影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2019,19 (2): 175-181, 188. [PENG Y, JIANG P, SHA X Y, et al. Evaluation and impact analysis of pedestrian-vehicle conflict severity[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(2): 175-181, 188.]

[3]ZHUANG X, ZHANG T, CHEN W, et al. Pedestrian estimation of their crossing time on multi-lane roads[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2020, 143: 105581.

[4]王超,顾永恒,何也,等.机动车礼让行人心理归因建模分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2023, 40(8): 185-191. [WANG C, GU Y H, HE Y, et al. Psychological attribution modeling analysis of motor vehicles yielding to pedestrians[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2023, 40(8): 185-191.]

[5]COUGHENOUR C, ABELAR J, PHARR J, et al. Estimated car cost as a predictor of driver yielding behaviors for pedestrians[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2020, 16: 100831.

[6]ZHAO J, MALENJE O J, WU J X, et al. Modeling the interaction between vehicle yielding and pedestrian crossing behavior at unsignalized midblock crosswalks [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 73: 222-235.

[7]向红艳,张清泉,范文博.基于蒙特卡洛模拟的无信号行人过街安全度模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(4): 171-177. [XIANG H Y, ZHANG Q Q, FAN W B. A safety degree model of pedestrian no-signal crossing walk based on monte carlo simulation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(4): 171-177.]

[8]WANG YJ, SU Q, WANG C, et al. Investigating yielding behavior of heterogeneous vehicles at a semi-controlled crosswalk[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 161: 106381.

[9]FORDE A, DANIEL J, MAINA V E. Modeling automobile interference due to midblock pedestrian activity on urban street segments[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems, 2017, 144 (1): 04017067.

[10] KAI T, ATHANASIOS T, CHONGFENG W, et al. Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour[J]. Accident, Analysis and Prevention, 2023, 190: 107173.

[11] PECHTEEP P, LUATHEP P, JAENSIRISAK S, et al. Analysis of factors influencing driver yielding behavior at midblock crosswalks on urban arterial roads in Thailand [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(10): 4118.

[12] BELLA F, FERRANTE C. Drivers' yielding behavior in different pedestrian crossing configurations: A field survey[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021(1): 1-10.

[13] ODAWA J M, JING Z, PENG L, et al. Vehicle yielding probability estimation model at unsignalized midblock crosswalks in Shanghai, China[J]. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14 (3): e0213876.

[14] LI H J, HU H D, ZHANG Z Q, et al. The role of yielding cameras in pedestrian-vehicle interactions at un signalized crosswalks: An application of game theoretical model[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 2023, 92: 27-43.

[15] WANG C, ZHANG H, WANG H, et al. The effect of "yield to pedestrians" policy enforcement on pedestrian street crossing behavior: A 3-year case study in Xi'an, China[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2021, 24: 172-180.

[16] GUO Y, SAYED T, LIU P, et al. Modeling temporal correlation and heterogeneity in real-time conflict rates using Bayesian Tobit models for signalized intersections [J]. Accident, Analysis and Prevention, 2024, 202: 107552.

相邻信号影响下的无信号路段驾驶员礼让行人分析

Analysis of Drivers Yielding to Pedestrians on Unsignalized Midblock Crosswalks Under Influence of Adjacent Traffic Signals

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	覃文文, 彭栋梁, 戢晓峰, 徐迎豪, 李冰, 李武, 曾浩. 山区双车道公路借道超车轨迹预测模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 96-106.
[2]	龙科军, 寇诗雨, 邢璐, 高志波, 唐幼仪, 费怡. 考虑货车影响的匝道合流区车辆微观换道行为建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 117-131.
[3]	程国柱, 陈永胜, 孟凤威, 徐亮. 客货混行异质交通流下高速公路专用道车流管理方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 178-189.
[4]	时玉琦, 杨晓光, 马成元. 随机需求下机非车道分配与复用优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 204-214.
[5]	黄榕, 谢紫萱, 王天桐, 许慧嘉, 陈洋, 赵轩. 不同疏散动机下狭窄过道区域单列人员运动特性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 224-231.
[6]	尚婷, 郭明洋, 唐伯明, 徐钰婷. 基于动态贝叶斯网络的地下道路行车风险评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 232-245.
[7]	潘义勇, 朱梦. 不同光照条件下交通事故严重程度影响因素的可转移性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 346-357.
[8]	胡立伟, 杨灿, 周泽禹, 潘江雄, 陈家乐, 龚麒, 马思月. 高速公路出口衔接城市路段交通风险时空动态识别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 358-371.
[9]	晋泽倩, 俞诚成, 叶昕. 混合效用和后悔规则下的洪涝交通疏散决策行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 16-25.
[10]	张河山, 曾长坤, 王海洋, 田丰铭, 郑展骥, 张羽. 高速公路夜间养护作业区事故风险辨识及影响机理研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 157-168.
[11]	邓院昌, 蒋昀轩, 陶胜芹. 基于可解释集成学习的异常驾驶行为风险识别方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 180-189.
[12]	巩喆, 杨轸, 郑瑞平, 袁方. 旁车切入下驾驶人短时响应行为异质性建模与分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 190-200.
[13]	王建军, 武京, 李景涛, 周英杰. 非公交车辆停靠对主辅式站台延误的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 241-252.
[14]	翁剑成, 周慧缘, 张梦媛, 于江波. 考虑城市与群体异质的新能源车激励策略有效性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 2-14.
[15]	宋现敏, 刘博, 李海涛, 湛天舒, 李世豪, 张云翔. 考虑综合效益的周期型停车预约分配模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 24-35.