风浪影响下的集装箱班轮航速优化

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 154-160.

风浪影响下的集装箱班轮航速优化

魏照坤¹，谢新连*¹，魏明²

1. 大连海事大学交通运输管理学院，辽宁大连116026; 2. 青岛港湾职业技术学院，山东青岛266404

收稿日期:2015-11-12 修回日期:2015-12-20 出版日期:2016-06-25 发布日期:2016-06-27
作者简介:魏照坤（1987-），男，山东青岛人，博士生.
基金资助:
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金/Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20102125110002).

Container Ship Speed Optimization under Influence of Wind and Wave

WEI Zhao-kun¹，XIE Xin-lian¹，WEI Ming²

1. Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian116026, Liaoning, China; 2. Qingdao Harbour Vocational & Technical College, Qingdao 266404, Shandong, China

Received:2015-11-12 Revised:2015-12-20 Online:2016-06-25 Published:2016-06-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

环保意识增强、航运市场低迷等原因迫使航运公司不得不在保证船队运输任务的前提下，降低燃油的消耗以减少对海洋造成的污染和运营成本.燃油的消耗与航速相关，而航速的确定又受风、浪等气象条件的制约.在考虑气象因素的基础上，建立了风、浪影响下的混合整型非线性(MINP)航速优化数学模型.由于MINP的复杂性，使模型求解困难，因此从船舶实际工作情况出发，对航速进行离散，将该混合整型非线性模型转化成混合整型线性模型(MILP)，利用CPLEX软件包进行求解，极大地提高了运算效率.通过速度离散转化为线性模型的方法，可以计算出不同风、浪条件下班轮运输各航段的最优航速和每条航线上船舶配备的最佳数目.仿真算例表明，该方法能够为班轮公司提供合理、可靠的船舶调度方案和决策支持.

关键词: 交通工程, 航速优化, 线性化, 集装箱班轮, 风浪

Abstract:

With enhancing of environmental awareness, shipping market is suffering a downturn that makes shipping companies reduce the fuel consumption for controlling ocean pollution and operating costs when transportation tasks can be completed. Fuel consumption is relation to the speed which is influenced by climate such as wave, wind and so on. To deal with speed optimization problem, the mix integer non-linear mathematical model is proposed based on the influence of wave and wind that is climate factor. Due to the complex of mix integer non- linear problem, it is difficult to be solved. Considering the actual situation of ships, the sailing speed is dispersed. At the same time, we transform the MINP model into MILP. The CPLEX is used to solve MILP model efficiently. By the algorithm of dispersing speed, the optimal speed and the number of ships that is in different voyages with various wave and wind conditions can be obtained. Experiments indicate that the method can apply reasonable ship schedules for shipping companies.

Key words: traffic engineering, speed optimization, linear, container liner ship, wave and wind

中图分类号:

魏照坤，谢新连，魏明. 风浪影响下的集装箱班轮航速优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(3): 154-160.

WEI Zhao-kun，XIE Xin-lian，WEI Ming. Container Ship Speed Optimization under Influence of Wind and Wave[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(3): 154-160.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19199.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V16/I3/154

参考文献

[1] RONEN D. The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1982(33):1035-1040.

[2] RONEN D. Ship scheduling: The last decade[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1993(71): 325-333.

[3] WANG S A, MENG Q. Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2012(48):701-714.

[4] RONEN D. The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011(62):211-216.

[5] 唐磊, 谢新连. 带时间窗约束的不定期船航速优化模型[J]. 物流技术, 2014, 33(2):132-135. [TANG L, XIE X L. Study on irregular vessel velocity optimization model with time window constraint[J]. Logistics Technology, 2014, 33(2): 132-135.]

[6] MENG Q, WANG S. Optimal operating strategy for a long-haul liner service route[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011(215):105-114.

[7] 贾欣乐, 杨盐生. 船舶运动数学模型[M]. 大连: 大连海事大学出版社, 1999. [JIA X L, YANG Y S. The mathematical model for ship motion[M]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University press, 1999.]

[8] DAIDOLA J C. A simulation program for vessel’s manoeuvring at slow speed[C]. Proceeding of Eleventh ship Technology and Research symposium, 1986.

[9] DEBABRATA S, CHINMAYA P P. An approach for development of a ship routing algorithm for application in the North Indian Ocean region[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2015(50): 173-191.

[10] LIN Y H, FANG M C, YEUNG R W . The optimization of ship weather- routing algorithm based on the composite influence of multi-dynamic elements[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2013(43):189- 194.

[11] FANG M C, LIN Y H. The optimization of ship weatherrouting algorithm based on composite influence of multidynamic elements(II): Optimized routings[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2015(50): 130-140.

[12] 岩井聪. 操船论[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1984. [YAN J C. The ship operation theory[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 1984.]

[13] 史国友, 朱公志, 王玉梅, 等. 恒向线主题直接正反解的高精度算法[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2009, 35(2): 5- 9. [SHI G Y, ZHU G Z, WANG Y M, et al. High accurate alogrithm for forward and inverse solution of rthumb line’s problem[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2009, 35(2):5-9.]

[14] PRICE W S, BISHOP R E D. Probabilistic theory of ship dynamic[M]. London: Chapmann and Hall Ltd, 1974.

[1]	林建新, 刘博, 赵霞, 张蕾. 基于混合约束自编码器的机动车工况智能构建方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 109-116.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师. 山区双车道公路货车碰撞预测的双变量冲突极值模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 230-238.
[3]	张建波, 孙建平, 徐春玲, 郭镜霞, 温慧敏, 宋国华. 考虑交通运行条件影响的驾驶员特征聚类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 330-336.
[4]	马景峰, 任刚, 李豪杰, 曹奇, 杜建玮. 电动自行车与机动车事故严重性影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 337-348.
[5]	宗芳, 王猛, 贺正冰. 考虑多车影响的分子动力学智能网联跟驰模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 37-48.
[6]	马小龙, 余强, 刘建蓓. 基于路侧毫米波雷达的车辆碰撞概率计算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 57-66.
[7]	廖鹏, 唐铁桥. 基于车辆动力传动和转向系统的换道轨迹优化策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 98-105.
[8]	刘永红, 罗霞, 胡剑鹏. 考虑临时和预约需求的共享泊位动态分配方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 171-181.
[9]	袁振洲, 郭曼泽, 彭泳鑫, 杨洋. 基于梯度关联规则的老年行人交通事故风险识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 195-208.
[10]	张玉婷, 陈波佑, 张双焱, 闫学东, 李晓梦. 抵近信控交叉口分心驾驶识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 217-224.
[11]	宋浪, 王健, 杨滨毓, 安实. 连续流交叉口左转非机动车交通组织创新设计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 225-233.
[12]	李德昌, 杨华龙, 赵帅奇, 郑建风. 排放控制区下集装箱班轮运输船期设计与燃油补给联合优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 273-281.
[13]	白婧荣, 唐伯明, 孙宗元, 毕辉云, 向恬君. 毗邻互通立交特长隧道驾驶负荷研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 301-310.
[14]	郭彦茹, 罗志雄, 王家川, 何方. 数据驱动的共享单车停放区规划方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 9-16.
[15]	李君羡, 沈宙彪, 童文聪, 吴志周. 基于分类车头时距的城市道路大型车影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 55-62.