基于韧性评估的地铁网络修复时序决策方法

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 14-20.

基于韧性评估的地铁网络修复时序决策方法

张洁斐，任刚^*，马景峰，高瑾瑶，朱形

东南大学交通学院，南京 211189

收稿日期:2020-04-01 修回日期:2020-05-28 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-08-25
作者简介:张洁斐(1991-)，女，山西运城人，博士生.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划/ National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019YFB1600200)；国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China(51578149).

Decision-making Method of Repair Sequence for Metro Network Based on Resilience Evaluation

ZHANG Jie-fei, REN Gang, MA Jing-feng, GAO Jin-yao, ZHU Xing

School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

Received:2020-04-01 Revised:2020-05-28 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高地铁应对突发事故的韧性，提出基于韧性评估的地铁网络修复时序方案决策方法.基于复杂网络理论，利用Space L方法构建地铁网络拓扑结构，部分节点失效后利用不同的修复策略生成备选方案；选取网络平均效率为性能指标，构建韧性指数评估不同修复时序方案下地铁网络韧性的表现，推荐韧性指数最大的方案为最优方案，探讨不同修复策略与网络恢复性能间的关系；以南京地铁为例进行实例分析.结果表明，多个节点失效时，优先修复策略受同步维修队伍个数的限制，前期表现较差，但有助于提升整个恢复阶段网络的性能；并行使用优先修复策略和增加维修队伍可有效提高网络韧性，缩短恢复时间.

关键词: 交通工程, 修复时序, 韧性评估, 地铁网络, 网络平均效率, 修复策略

Abstract:

In order to improve the resilience of the metro network after some accidents, a decision- making method of repair sequence based on resilience evaluation is proposed. Based on the complex network theory, the space L method was used to construct the metro network topology. After some Metro nodes damaged, alternative schemes were generated based on the combination of different recovery strategies. The network average efficiency was chosen as the network performance indicators, the resilience index was constructed to evaluate the network resilience of different repair schemes, the scheme with the biggest resilience index was recommended as the optimal one. Then the relationship between recovery strategies and optimal scheme was discussed. Taking Nanjing Metro as an example, the result shows that in the case of multiple nodes fail, the priority repair strategy may not perform well in the early stage because of the limit of maintenance team, but it is more helpful to improve the network performance in the whole recovery stage; In addition, when multiple nodes fail, using priority repair strategy and increasing maintenance teams together can effectively improve network resilience and shorten the recovery time.

Key words: traffic engineering, repair sequence, resilience evaluation, metro network, network average efficiency, recovery strategy

中图分类号:

U491

张洁斐，任刚，马景峰，高瑾瑶，朱形. 基于韧性评估的地铁网络修复时序决策方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 14-20.

ZHANG Jie-fei, REN Gang, MA Jing-feng, GAO Jin-yao, ZHU Xing. Decision-making Method of Repair Sequence for Metro Network Based on Resilience Evaluation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(4): 14-20.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract20075.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V20/I4/14

参考文献

[1] RIGHI A W, SAURIN T A, WACHS P. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 141: 142-152.

[2] 杨金顺, 孙洪运, 李林波, 等. 道路交通系统恢复力研究进展综述[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2014, 3(32): 87-93.[YANG J S, SUN H Y, LI L B, et al. Review of road transportation system resilience research[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2014, 3(32): 87-93.]

[3] 赵旭东, 陈志龙, 龚华栋, 等.关键基础设施体系灾害毁伤恢复力研究综述[J].土木工程学报, 2017, 50(12):62- 71. [ZHAO X D, CHEN Z L, GONG H D, et al. Review on the study of disaster resilience of critical infrastructure systems[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(12): 62-71.]

[4] 孙杨, 刘星材, 景春光, 等.不确定需求下轨道交通网络的鲁棒性优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015,15(4): 181- 197. [SUN Y, LIU X C, JING C G, et al. Robust optimization for rail transit network under uncertainty demand[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015,15(4): 181-197.]

[5] 肖雪梅, 贾利民. 城市轨道交通路网连通可靠度评估模型[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2016, 37(1): 132-137. [XIAO X M, JIA L M. Evaluation model for connectivity reliability of urban rail transit network[J]. China Railway Science, 2016, 37(1): 132-137.]

[6] 胡斌, 黎放.多种攻击策略下无标度网络修复策略[J].系统工程与电子技术，2010, 32(1): 86-89. [HU B, LI F. Repair strategies of scale- free networks under multifold attack strategies[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(1): 86-89.]

[7] 陈峰, 胡映月, 李小红, 等. 城市轨道交通有权网络相继故障可靠性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息，2016, 16(2): 139-145. [CHEN F, HU Y Y, LI X H, et al. Cascading failures in weighted network of urban rail transit[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(2):139-145.]

[8] ZHANG D M，DU F，HUANG H，et al. Resiliency assessment of urban rail transit networks: Shanghai metro as an example[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 106: 230-243.

[9] 李兆隆, 金淳, 胡畔, 等.基于弹复性的交通网络应急恢复阶段策略优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(11): 2828- 2841. [LI Z L, JIN C, HU P, et al. Resilience-based recovery strategy optimization in emergency recovery phase for transportation networks[J]. Systems Engineering- Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(11): 2828-2841.]

[10] YANG Y H, LIUY X, ZHOUM X, et al. Robustness assessment of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: A case study of the Beijing subway[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 79: 149-162.

[11] OUYANG M, DUEÑAS- OSORIO L, MIN X. A threestage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 36(37):23-31.

[12] HOSSEINIS, BARKER K, RAMIREZ- MARQUEZ J E. A review of definitions and measures of system resilience [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 145:47-61.

[13] AYYUB B M. Systems resilience for multihazard environments: definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making[J]. Risk Analysis, 2014, 34(2): 340-355.

[14] WANG, X G, KOÇ Y, DERRIBLE S, et al. Multicriteria robustness analysis of metro networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2017, 474: 19-31.

[1]	林建新, 刘博, 赵霞, 张蕾. 基于混合约束自编码器的机动车工况智能构建方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 109-116.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师. 山区双车道公路货车碰撞预测的双变量冲突极值模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 230-238.
[3]	张建波, 孙建平, 徐春玲, 郭镜霞, 温慧敏, 宋国华. 考虑交通运行条件影响的驾驶员特征聚类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 330-336.
[4]	马景峰, 任刚, 李豪杰, 曹奇, 杜建玮. 电动自行车与机动车事故严重性影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 337-348.
[5]	宗芳, 王猛, 贺正冰. 考虑多车影响的分子动力学智能网联跟驰模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 37-48.
[6]	马小龙, 余强, 刘建蓓. 基于路侧毫米波雷达的车辆碰撞概率计算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 57-66.
[7]	廖鹏, 唐铁桥. 基于车辆动力传动和转向系统的换道轨迹优化策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 98-105.
[8]	刘永红, 罗霞, 胡剑鹏. 考虑临时和预约需求的共享泊位动态分配方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 171-181.
[9]	袁振洲, 郭曼泽, 彭泳鑫, 杨洋. 基于梯度关联规则的老年行人交通事故风险识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 195-208.
[10]	张玉婷, 陈波佑, 张双焱, 闫学东, 李晓梦. 抵近信控交叉口分心驾驶识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 217-224.
[11]	宋浪, 王健, 杨滨毓, 安实. 连续流交叉口左转非机动车交通组织创新设计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 225-233.
[12]	白婧荣, 唐伯明, 孙宗元, 毕辉云, 向恬君. 毗邻互通立交特长隧道驾驶负荷研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 301-310.
[13]	郭彦茹, 罗志雄, 王家川, 何方. 数据驱动的共享单车停放区规划方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 9-16.
[14]	李君羡, 沈宙彪, 童文聪, 吴志周. 基于分类车头时距的城市道路大型车影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 55-62.
[15]	卢凯, 周志洁, 张勇刚, 赵世杰, 徐广辉. 面向单向交通路网的绿波协调设计方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 74-83.