高速公路收费广场车道合理化配置研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 231-237.

高速公路收费广场车道合理化配置研究

钱超^*1，李思言¹，王彦锋²

1. 长安大学，电子与控制工程学院，西安 710064；2. 深圳高速公路股份有限公司，广东深圳 518026

收稿日期:2021-01-14 修回日期:2021-03-12 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:钱超(1984- )，男，江苏新沂人，副教授，博士。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划/National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1600100)；陕西省自然科学基金/Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China (2019JQ-264)。

Rationalized Lanes Configuration for Expressway Toll Plaza

QIAN Chao^*1 , LI Si-yan¹, WANG Yan-feng²

1. School of Electronics and Control Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China; 2. Shenzhen Expressway Company Limited, Shenzhen 518026, Guangdong, China

Received:2021-01-14 Revised:2021-03-12 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为评估ETC使用率提升后对收费广场通行效率的影响，并提出合理车道配置方案，依托深圳机荷高速福民收费站车道布设和收费数据，建立包含跟驰和换道行为的收费广场交通行为模型，开发收费广场交通运行微观仿真平台。分别针对平、高峰时段，以ETC车道数及使用率为变量设计80组仿真方案，综合评价不同方案下收费广场通行效率。与实测结果的对比表明：仿真平台对平、高峰时段交通量误差仅为3.46%和6.45%，为收费广场车道配置仿真分析提供了准确、可靠的实验平台；未来ETC使用率提升至90%时，福民收费站最优车道配置方案为“4条ETC车道加 5条ETC/MTC混合车道”，此时高峰时段单车平均延误可降至2.93 s·veh-1，较目前的60.23 s·veh-1 降低95%。结合交通量、交通组成及ETC使用率开展收费广场车道合理化配置研究，可为收费广场设计、运营提供关键技术支撑。

关键词: 交通工程, 车道配置, 微观交通仿真, 收费广场, 高速公路

Abstract:

This research aimed to evaluate the traffic efficiency of expressway toll plaza and propose the rationalized lanes configuration scheme due to the increase of the ETC utilization rate. Based on the static layout and toll data of Fumin, a ramp toll station in Shenzhen Jihe expressway, the traffic behavior model in toll plaza, including carfollowing and lane- changing model, was established. The micro- simulation platform of traffic operation of the toll plaza was developed. According to the traffic status variation during non-peak and peak hour, 80 groups of simulation schemes were designed, taking ETC utilization rates and the number of lanes into consideration. The traffic efficiency under different schemes was comprehensively evaluated. The comparison with the actual results demonstrates that the simulation platform errors of traffic volume for usual and rush hour were only 3.46% and 6.45%, providing an accurate and reliable experimental platform for the simulation analysis of toll plaza lane configuration. In the future, when the ETC utilization rate is increased up to 90%, the optimal lane configuration scheme for Fumin is 4 ETC lanes plus 5 ETC/MTC mixed lanes. During rush hour, the average delay per vehicle could be conduced to 2.93 s · veh- 1 , a 95 percent reduction from the current 60.23 s· veh-1 . The toll plaza's rationalized lanes configuration should be conducted by combining traffic volume, traffic composition, ETC utilization rate. It provides crucial technical support for the scientific design and operation of the toll plaza.

Key words: traffic engineering, lane configuration, traffic micro-simulation, toll plaza, expressway

中图分类号:

U491

钱超，李思言，王彦锋. 高速公路收费广场车道合理化配置研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 231-237.

QIAN Chao,LI Si-yan,WANG Yan-feng. Rationalized Lanes Configuration for Expressway Toll Plaza[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(2): 231-237.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract30234.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V21/I2/231

参考文献

[1] 程俊龙. ETC通道通行能力与服务水平确定方法研究 [J]. 公路交通科技, 2014, 31(6): 133-137. [CHENG J L. Research on method of determining ETC channel capacity and service level[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 31(6): 133-137.]

[2] KIM S. The toll plaza optimization problem: Design, operations, and strategies[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2009, 45 (1): 125-137.

[3] GU W, CASSIDY M J, LI Y. On the capacity of highway checkpoints: Models for unconventional configurations [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2012, 46(10): 1308-1321.

[4] 张晨琛, 王艳辉, 贾利民. 高速公路主线收费站拥堵消散控制策略[J]. 中国公路学报, 2013, 26(4): 139-145. [ZHANG C C, WANG Y H, JIA L M. Congestion dissipation control strategies for expressway mainline toll station[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(4): 139-145.]

[5] 姬杨蓓蓓, 周金凤. 基于成本分析的高速公路收费站车道配置研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 37(1): 85- 91. [JI Y B B, ZHOU J F. Lane allocation of highway toll gate based on cost analysis[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Sciences), 2018, 37(1): 85-91.]

[6] 林培群, 梁韫琦. 高速公路收费站车道类型设置问题建模与求解[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20 (1): 152- 159. [LIN P Q, LIANG Y Q. Modeling and solving for lane type setting problem in highway toll station[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1): 152-159.]

[7] 姬杨蓓蓓, 魏妙旗, 张小宁. 收费站通道开放数量优化的动态瓶颈模型分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(3): 109-115. [JI Y B B, WEI M Q, ZHANG X N. Dynamic model on optimal open toll gates number of the highway [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019, 33(3): 109-115.]

[8] NAVANDAR Y V, DHAMANIYA A, PATEL D A. Empirical analysis of level of service based on users perception at manual tollbooth operation in India[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2019, 37: 314-321.

[9] 张晨琛, 王艳辉, 贾利民. ETC系统对收费站服务水平的影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2013, 13 (2): 147- 152. [ZHANG C C, WANG Y H, JIA L M. Impact of ETC system on service level of toll plazas[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2013, 13: 147-152.]

[10] 杨涛, 王鹏, 朱季萍, 等. 多元收费方式下的高速公路收费站车道数优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 212-218. [YANG T, WANG P, ZHU J P, et al. Optimization of lane number of highway toll station based on multiple payments[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(5): 212-218.]

[11] BRACKSTONE M, MCDONALD M. Car- following: A historical review[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1999, 2(4): 181-196.

[12] HIDAS P. Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2005, 13(1): 37-62.

[1]	林建新, 刘博, 赵霞, 张蕾. 基于混合约束自编码器的机动车工况智能构建方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 109-116.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师. 山区双车道公路货车碰撞预测的双变量冲突极值模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 230-238.
[3]	张建波, 孙建平, 徐春玲, 郭镜霞, 温慧敏, 宋国华. 考虑交通运行条件影响的驾驶员特征聚类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 330-336.
[4]	马景峰, 任刚, 李豪杰, 曹奇, 杜建玮. 电动自行车与机动车事故严重性影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 337-348.
[5]	宗芳, 王猛, 贺正冰. 考虑多车影响的分子动力学智能网联跟驰模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 37-48.
[6]	马小龙, 余强, 刘建蓓. 基于路侧毫米波雷达的车辆碰撞概率计算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 57-66.
[7]	廖鹏, 唐铁桥. 基于车辆动力传动和转向系统的换道轨迹优化策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 98-105.
[8]	刘永红, 罗霞, 胡剑鹏. 考虑临时和预约需求的共享泊位动态分配方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 171-181.
[9]	袁振洲, 郭曼泽, 彭泳鑫, 杨洋. 基于梯度关联规则的老年行人交通事故风险识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 195-208.
[10]	张玉婷, 陈波佑, 张双焱, 闫学东, 李晓梦. 抵近信控交叉口分心驾驶识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 217-224.
[11]	宋浪, 王健, 杨滨毓, 安实. 连续流交叉口左转非机动车交通组织创新设计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 225-233.
[12]	白婧荣, 唐伯明, 孙宗元, 毕辉云, 向恬君. 毗邻互通立交特长隧道驾驶负荷研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 301-310.
[13]	郭彦茹, 罗志雄, 王家川, 何方. 数据驱动的共享单车停放区规划方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 9-16.
[14]	李君羡, 沈宙彪, 童文聪, 吴志周. 基于分类车头时距的城市道路大型车影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 55-62.
[15]	卢凯, 周志洁, 张勇刚, 赵世杰, 徐广辉. 面向单向交通路网的绿波协调设计方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 74-83.