有限理性下考虑出发时间选择的网络交通流演化

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 127-135.

有限理性下考虑出发时间选择的网络交通流演化

刘诗序^*1，陈文思¹，阎昊¹，关宏志²

1. 福州大学土木工程学院，福州350116; 2. 北京工业大学建筑工程学院，北京100124

收稿日期:2016-12-29 修回日期:2017-02-21 出版日期:2017-06-25 发布日期:2017-06-26
作者简介:刘诗序（1983-），男，湖北大冶人，讲师，博士.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目/ National Natural Science Foundation of China(51308126, 51378036, 51308018).

Network Traffic Flow Evolution Considering Departure Time Choice Based on Bounded Rationality

LIU Shi-xu¹, CHENWen-si¹, YAN Hao¹, GUAN Hong-zhi ²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China; 2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2016-12-29 Revised:2017-02-21 Online:2017-06-25 Published:2017-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

假设出行者出发时间与路径选择随历史出行信息的更新而不断调整，研究网络交通流逐日动态演化规律.考虑出行者有限理性，基于累积前景理论，建立了出行者出发时间选择、时间间隔权重更新、路径选择及路径行程时间分布更新模型.通过数值实验表明：出行者对历史理解行程时间依赖程度对每个出发时段的稳定的流量分布无显著影响，但是对路径流量演化有显著影响；当出行者对历史理解行程时间的依赖程度大于等于0.90 时，考虑出发时间选择的路网流量演化最终能达到稳定状态；从系统的整体效率来看，当出行者对历史理解行程时间的依赖程度在[0.90,0.95]时，有限理性下的交通分配结果优于完全理性.

关键词: 交通工程, 有限理性, 累积前景理论, 网络交通流, 路径选择, 出发时间

Abstract:

It is assumed that travelers adjust departure time and route choices according to updating historical information. With considering traveler’s bounded rationality, the day- to-day dynamic models of network traffic flow are developed based on the cumulative prospect theory. The proposed models reveal how travelers make departure time and route choices, update the time interval weight, and the route travel time distribution function. Numerical experiments on a grid network show that the reliance on historical perceived travel time have no significant effect on the stable flow distribution of each departure time interval, but have significant effect on network traffic flow evolution. When the reliance on historical perceived travel time is greater than or equal to 0.90, the network traffic flow considering departure time choice will eventually reach a steady state. From the perspective of the overall efficiency of the network system, when the reliance on historical perceived travel time is within [0.90, 0.95], the boundedly rational traffic assignment will be better than the perfectly rational one.

Key words: traffic engineering, bounded rationality, cumulative prospect theory, network traffic flow, route choice, departure time

中图分类号:

U491

刘诗序，陈文思，阎昊，关宏志. 有限理性下考虑出发时间选择的网络交通流演化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(3): 127-135.

LIU Shi-xu, CHENWen-si, YAN Hao, GUAN Hong-zhi. Network Traffic Flow Evolution Considering Departure Time Choice Based on Bounded Rationality[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(3): 127-135.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19423.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V17/I3/127

参考文献

[1] NAKAYAMA S, KITAMURA R, FUJII S. Drivers’ learning and network behavior: A dynamic analysis of the driver-network system as a complex system[J].Transportation Research Record, 1999(1676): 30-36.

[2] NAKAYAMA S, KITAMURA R. A route choice model with inductive learning[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2000(1725): 63-70.

[3] NAKAYAMA S, KITAMURA R, FUJII S. Drivers’route choice rules and network behavior: Do drivers become rational and homogeneous through learning?[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2001(1752): 62-68.

[4] SIMON H A. Behavioral model of rational choice[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955(69): 99-120.

[5] MAHMASSANI H S, CHANG G. On boundedly rational user equilibrium in transportation systems[J]. Transportation Science, 1987, 21(2): 89-99.

[6] ZHANG L. Behavioral foundation of route choice and traffic assignment[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2011(2254): 1-10.

[7] 刘诗序, 关宏志. 出行者有限理性下的逐日路径选择行为和网络交通流演化[J]. 土木工程学报，2013，46 (12): 136-144. [LIU S X, GUAN H Z. Travelers’dayto- day route-choice behavior and evolution of network traffic flow based on bounded rationality[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(12): 136-144.]

[8] LOU Y, YIN Y, LAWPHONGPANICH S. Robust congestion pricing under boundedly rational user equilibrium[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2010, 44 (1): 15-28.

[9] GUO X, LIU H X. Bounded rationality and irreversible network change[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2011, 45(10): 1606-1618.

[10] HAN K, SZETO W Y, FRIESZ T L. Formulation, existence, and computation of boundedly rational dynamic user equilibrium with fixed or endogenous user tolerance[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2015(79): 16-49.

[11] AVINERI E. The effect of reference point on stochastic network equilibrium[J]. Transportation Science, 2006, 40(4): 409-420.

[12] 张杨, 贾建民, 黄庆. 城市交通中车辆择路行为实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2007, 22(5): 78-85. [ZHANG Y, JIA J M, HUANG Q. Vehicle routing choice in urban traffic[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2007, 22(5): 78-85.]

[13] 张杨. 不确定性对城市交通出行者路径选择的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2010, 10(5): 77- 80. [ZHANG Y. Impact of uncertainty on traveler route choice in urban traffic[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(5): 77-80.]

[14] BAO Y, GAO Z Y, XU M, et al. Tradable credit scheme for mobility management considering travelers’ loss aversion[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2014(68): 138-154.

[15] 刘玉印, 刘伟铭, 吴建伟. 基于累积前景理论的出行者路径选择模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报, 2010, 38(7): 84-89. [LIU Y Y，LIU W M，WU J W. Route choice model of traveler based on cumulative prospect theory[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology, 2010, 38(7): 84-89.]

[16] 田丽君, 黄海军, 王昕. 考虑到达时间感知价值的静态网络均衡模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015(6): 1493-1500. [TIAN L J，HUANG H J，WANG X. The static network equilibrium model considering the arrival time perceived value[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2015(6): 1493-1500.]

[17] 徐红利, 于新莲, 周晶. 诱导信息下考虑路段容量退化的流量演化研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(7): 39- 47. [XU H L, YU X L, ZHOU J. Day- to- day travel choice dynamic with guidance information in degradable transport network[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, 18(7): 39-47.]

[18] 杨志勇. 基于前景理论的出发时刻和出行路径选择模型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2007. [YANG Z Y. Model research of departure time and travel route choice based on prospect theory[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007.]

[19] 陈玲娟, 王殿海, 代炯. 考虑出发时刻调整的日变路网配流模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(6): 190-196. [CHEN L J，WANG D H，DAI J. Day-to-day traffic flow assignment model considering departure time adjustment[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(6): 190-196.]

[20] 刘天亮, 黄海军. 日常择路行为的多智能体模拟[J]. 物理学报, 2007, 56(11): 6321-6325. [LIU T L, HUANG H J. Multi-agent simulation on day-to-day route choice behavior[J]. Acta. Physica. Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6321- 6325.]